Showing posts with label r7. Show all posts
Showing posts with label r7. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 10, 2018

OSGi R7 Highlights: The Converter

One of the entirely new specifications in the OSGi R7 set of specs is the Converter specification. The converter can convert between many different Java types and can also be a highly convenient tool to give untyped data a proper API.

Let's dive in with some simple converter examples:

// Obtain the converter
Converter c = Converters.standardConverter();

// Simple scalar conversions
int i = c.convert("123").to(int.class);
UUID id = c.convert("067e6162-3b6f-4ae2-a171-2470b63dff00")
           .to(UUID.class);
BigDecimal bd = c.convert(12345).to(BigDecimal.class);

Collections, arrays and maps can also be converted:

List<String> ls = Arrays.asList("978", "142", "-99");

// Convert a List of Strings to a Set of Integers, 
// note the use of TypeReference to capture the generics
Set<Integer> is = c.convert(ls)
                   .to(new TypeReference<Set<Integer>>(){});

// Convert between map-like structures
Dictionary<String, String> d = ...; // some dictionary
Map m = c.convert(d).to(Map.class);

// Even though properties contain String keys and values, you 
// can't assign them to a Map<String, String>, the converter 
// can make this easy...
Properties p = ...; // a properties object
Map<String, String> n = c.convert(p)
           .to(new TypeReference<Map<String,String>>(){});

The above examples show that many different types of conversions can be made with the converter, using the same convert(object).to(type) API.

Note that the converter is obtained by calling Converters.standardConverter() so by default it's not registered in the service registry. This makes the converter usable in both OSGi Framework as well as in plain Java environments.

Backing Objects

An interesting feature of the converter is that it can convert between maps and Java types such as interfaces, annotations and java beans. Together we call these map-like types. In certain cases the conversion can provide a live view over the backing object. 

For example, let's say you have an interface MyAPI:

interface MyAPI {
    long timeout();
    long timeout(long defval);
}

Now you have a map that contains a timeout key with some value, if you want to expose that via the MyAPI interface the converter can do this:

Map<String, Long> m = new HashMap<>();
m.put("timeout", 999L);
MyAPI o = c.convert(m).to(MyAPI.class);
System.out.println(o.timeout()); // prints 999
m.put("timeout", 1000L);         // update the underlying map
System.out.println(o.timeout()); // prints 1000

The other way around is also possible. For example, if you have a JavaBean that you need to view as a Map, then the converter can do this. In the following example, we see that in order for the converter to handle a source object as a JavaBean you need to specify the sourceAsBean() modifier. Additionally, live views for maps are not enabled by default and are enabled with the view() modifier.

MyBean bean = new MyBean();
bean.setLength(120);
bean.setWidth(75);
Map<String, String> bm = c.convert(bean).sourceAsBean().view()
           .to(new TypeReference<Map<String,String>>(){});
System.out.println("Bean map:" + bm);
bean.setWidth(125)                    // update the bean
System.out.println("Bean map:" + bm); // map reflects the update

In addition to the map-like types mentioned above, the converter can handle DTOs and when an object exposes a method called getProperties(), it can take this as the source map as well.

Defaults

Converting a map or properties object to a Java interface can be a really useful way to give some untyped configuration a well-defined API. Often you'd want to be able to specify some defaults for the configuration values that you're using, in case they are not specified. When converting to interfaces or annotations defaults can be specified.

When converting to an interface, the interface may define a one-argument method to specify the default, as is done with the MyAPI interface above. To specify the default pass it into the method:

Map<String, Long> m = new HashMap<>(); // empty map
MyAPI o = c.convert(m).to(MyAPI.class);

// default to 750 if no timeout is in the map
System.out.println(o.timeout(750L));

Handling defaults via an annotation is even a little neater, as the Java annotation syntax allows for the specification of defaults.     

@interface MyAnn {
    long timeout() default 100;
}

MyAnn a = c.convert(m2).to(MyAnn.class);
System.out.println(a.timeout()); // use default 100
m2.put("timeout", 500L);
System.out.println(a.timeout()); // now get the actual value 500


Customizing Converters

While the converter can convert between many types (see the spec chapter for the actual list of supported types) it doesn't understand every single Java type ever created. Let's say we have two custom types Foo and Bar. There is a conversion between the two, but the converter doesn't know about it. We can create a customized converter that, on top of its existing conversions, knows about our special conversion as well!

Let's say our custom classes look a bit like this. The Foo class can be represented as a string which you can obtain via its read() method. The Bar class can hold a byte array.

public class Foo {
    // ...
    public String read() {
        return val;
    }
}

public static class Bar {
    byte[] buf;

    public static Bar create(byte[] b) {
        Bar bar = new Bar();
        bar.buf = b;
        return bar;
    }
}

To create a converter that, on top of the existing conversions, knows about Foo and Bar, we use a converter builder and register a rule with that to do the conversion. In the example below, the Rule object declares the source and the target of the rule. The conversion is provided as a lambda:

Foo f = ...; // Some Foo object
Converter custom = c.newConverterBuilder()
    .rule(new Rule<Foo, Bar>(
        foo -> Bar.create(foo.read().getBytes())){})
    .build();

// Now we can convert Foo to Bar!
Bar b = custom.convert(f).to(Bar.class);

Now the converter can convert our custom objects. An additional benefit is that the converter is an immutable object. You can customize an already customized converter by creating a new converter based on the previously created custom one.

Because the converter is immutable it's ideal for sharing, so once you've customized the perfect converter for your application, a good way to share it is by registering it in the OSGi Service Registry, and because the default converter isn't available in the service registry, your application components can simply look up the Converter service to get the one you registered for application wide usage.

Getting Started

This blog post doesn't cover all the details of the converter specification. See the spec chapter for more info on those. Like to get started straight away? At the time of this writing the specs are still under vote and not yet finally released. However, you can obtain a snapshot converter implementation from the OSGi Maven Repo: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/osgi/org/osgi/org.osgi.util.converter/ or you can build one yourself from the codebase in the Apache Felix project: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/felix/trunk/converter/converter.



Want to find out more about OSGi R7?

This is one post in a series of 12 focused on OSGi R7 Highlights.  Previous posts are:
  1. Proposed Final Draft Now Available
  2. Java 9 Support
  3. Declarative Services
  4. The JAX-RS Whiteboard
Be sure to follow us on Twitter or LinkedIn or subscribe to our Blog feed to find out when it's available.

Tuesday, February 27, 2018

OSGi R7 Highlights: Java 9 Support

With the Java 9 release, the Java Platform Module System (JPMS) is a major feature that impacts many areas of the Java Platform.  The JPMS is used to modularize the class libraries provided by the Java Platform.  In addition, it has been proposed that the JPMS can be used by developers to modularize their own applications, although the OSGi Alliance cautions against its use here.

Meanwhile the OSGi Core specification has provided a stable platform for developing modular Java applications for well over 17 years.  The OSGi Core R7 specification continues this tradition by providing updates to the OSGi Core specification which are fully compatible with previous versions of the OSGi Core specification.  OSGi Core R7 Framework implementations will be able to run on top of Java 9 without requiring any changes to existing OSGi application bundles (assuming no internal packages from the Java platform are being used).

The OSGi Core R7 specification has a couple of new features that build upon some features new to Java 9.  This includes support for multi-release JARs and runtime discovery of packages provided by the JPMS modules loaded by the platform.  First I will tell you about the multi-release JAR support.

Multi-Release JAR Support

Java 9 introduces a new type of JAR called a multi-release JAR.  A multi-release JAR file allows for a single JAR to support multiple major versions of the Java platform. For example, a multi-release JAR file can depend on both the Java 8 and Java 9 major platform releases, where some class depend on APIs in Java 8 and other class depend on APIs in Java 9.

The purpose of multi-release JARs is to support alternative implementation of select classes to deal with changes in the visible APIs of the Java platform.  That is, it is not meant as a means to supply new function or new API on different Java platform versions. As a best practice new APIs should be released in an updated version of an existing bundle or released as part of a new bundle.

The OSGi Core R7 specification adds support for multi-release JAR files. An OSGi bundle file can be a multi-release JAR by adding the following manifest header to the bundle manifest:

 Multi-Release: true

Any JAR included on the bundle class path can also be independently declared as a multi-release JAR by including the same manifest header:

  Multi-Release: true

in its own JAR manifest. For example, an OSGi bundle can include third-party multi-release JARs on its own bundle classpath. In this case the third-party multi-release JARs will be loaded as multi-release JARs by the OSGi Framework even if the bundle JAR itself is not a multi-release JAR.

When a JAR on the bundle class path is a multi-release JAR, then the Framework must search the JAR's versioned directories when attempting to locate a class or resource in the JAR. For more information on how classes and resources are loaded from multi-release JARs see the multi-release JAR documentation.

Different implementations of a Java class for different versions of the Java platform can affect the requirements of the bundle.  For example, what packages need to be imported from the running Java platform. The R7 Framework supports supplemental manifest files that can be used to specify alternative values for the Import-Package and Require-Capability manifest headers for different versions of the Java platform.

When a bundle file is a multi-release JAR, then the Framework must also look for a supplemental manifest file, OSGI-INF/MANIFEST.MF, in the versioned directories. For example:

  META-INF/versions/9/OSGI-INF/MANIFEST.MF

The Framework finds the highest versioned manifest available in the multi-release JAR which can be applied to the running Java platform and uses the Import-Package and Require-Capability manifest headers as replacements for the values specified in the bundle's manifest.

The purpose of the supplemental manifest is to specify requirements on capabilities provided by different versions of the Java platform which are needed by the implementation classes for that Java platform version. As a best practice, the supplemental manifests should not contain additional requirements on capabilities which are not supplied by the Java platform for the Java version associated with the supplemental manifest.

For more information about multi-release JAR support you can refer to the following sections of the OSGi Core R7 specification:
  1. Bundle File Multi-release JAR
  2. Bundle class path Multi-release Container

Runtime Discovery of Java Platform Packages

Now that the Java platform is modularized in Java 9, the runtime can be configured to load only the modules which are required by the application.  This allows for a smaller custom runtime that is tailored to the needs of a specific application.  The set of java.* packages provide by the running Java platform is no longer constant for a specific version of the Java platform.

Bundles typically depend on different packages by using requirements specified with the Import-Package header, but as of the OSGi Core R4 specification, bundles have been prohibited from using Import-Package to specify requirements on java.* packages.  Instead bundles have used the osgi.ee namespace (or the deprecated Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment header) to specify a dependency on specific versions of the Java platform. It has been assumed that the set of java.* packages available for a specific version of the Java platform is constant and therefore there is no need to specify additional requirements on specific java.* packages.

With Java 9 this is no longer a valid assumption.  With OSGi Core R7, the osgi.ee namespace should only be used to specify the minimal level of the Java platform required by the Java class bytecode level included in the bundle.  Dependencies on specific java.* packages should to be specified using the Import-Package header.

The OSGi Core R7 specification now allows bundles to use the Import-Package header to import java.* packages.  The OSGi Framework implementation is required to discover the all available java.* packages in the running Java platform and automatically provide the java.* package as a separate system packages (see the system packages configuration property).  The system bundle is the only bundle that is allowed to provide java.* packages. It is an error for normal bundles to attempt to export java.* packages using the Export-Package header.

When importing java.* packages only the package name should be specified, no other matching attributes are needed.  For example:

  Import-Package: java.sql

Note that bundle class loaders in R7 continue to have full visibility to all available java.* packages available in the running Java platform.  The class and resource loads for the java.* packages will continue to be boot delegated by the framework implementation even when the bundle does not specify any Import-Package header. The java.* package requirements are only necessary to prevent a bundle from resolving if the necessary java.* packages are not available at runtime.  For example, if a bundle must only resolve if the java.sql module is loaded.

For more information about java* package support you can refer to the following sections of the OSGi Core R7 specification:
  1. Execution Environment
  2. Parent Delegation 

Bundles Supporting R6 and R7 Frameworks

The OSGi Core R6 specification prohibits bundles from importing java.* packages and will throw a BundleException if such a bundle is attempted to be installed. Bundles that must work on OSGi R6 and earlier Frameworks but also want to run on R7 Frameworks have two options:

  1. Do not import the java.* packages.  The bundle will continue to work on an R7 framework because java.* packages are still boot delegated by the bundle class loaders. This implies the bundle may resolve when running on Java 9 even when all the java.* packages required by the bundle are not available.
  2. Package the bundle as a multi-release JAR to allow alternative values for Import-Package to be specified.
A bundle that must still be able to be installed on an OSGi R6 or earlier Framework must not specify java.* packages in their main bundle manifest Import-Package header. A supplemental manifest must also be included to be able to specify java.* package imports.

This supplemental manifest must contain the original Import-Package header from the main bundle manifest as well as any java.* package required by the bundle. When running on an OSGi R6 Framework, this supplemental manifest will be ignored and therefore the bundle will install successfully as the bundle did not specify an import for the java.* packages in the main manifest.

If a bundle will always require OSGi R7 or greater Framework, there is no need to use multi-release JARs for this purpose even when the bundle must support Java 8 or earlier. This is because OSGi R7 frameworks must provide the java.* package capabilities on all Java platform versions the framework implementation supports. As long as the java.* package is available on the running Java platform, the bundle with an import for the java.* package must resolve.

I advise using option 1 here because it is by far the most simple approach.  If you really have a strong need to use this new R7 feature then I recommend you do not try to produce a single bundle version that supports both R6 and R7 Frameworks.  Instead simply release a new version of your bundle that only supports OSGi R7 or greater Frameworks.

In Summary

The OSGi Core R7 release continues the tradition by providing a stable modular platform with updates to the OSGi Core specification which are fully compatible with previous versions of the OSGi Core specification.  OSGi bundle developers can continue to develop advanced modular applications and run their applications on Java 9 without having to commit to migrating to the green initial release of JPMS.

The OSGi Core R7 specification does add new functionality in support of new features available in Java 9, such as the support for multi-release JARs and importing of java.* packages.  The OSGi specifications will continue to evolve in order to provide the necessary tools for developing advanced modular applications.

Tuesday, February 13, 2018

OSGi R7 Highlights: Proposed Final Draft Now Available

I am pleased to announce that the OSGi Alliance has published the Proposed Final Drafts of the OSGi Core R7 and Compendium R7 specifications. We expect that the final versions of these specifications will be published in April 2018 after OSGi Alliance member approval.

The R7 release builds upon the long history of the OSGi Alliance’s leadership in Java modularity and reflects a significant amount of effort from the technical members of the OSGi Alliance expert groups over the last 2 years. Thanks go to all of the members who have contributed to this release.

R7 represents many significant new features and capabilities and provides an open standards-based approach for a number of modern valuable and simple-to-use technologies important to Java developers.

This blog post is the start of a series of blog posts from the technical experts at the OSGi Alliance to share some of the key highlights of R7. The blog posts in this series will come out over the coming weeks and cover the following topics:
  • Java 9 Support – Multi-release JAR support and runtime discovery of the packages provided by the JPMS modules loaded by the platform.
  • Declarative Services – Constructor injection and component property types.
  • JAX-RS – A whiteboard model for building JAX-RS microservices.
  • Converter – A package for object type conversion.
  • Cluster Information – Support for using OSGi frameworks in clustered environments.
  • Transaction Control – An OSGi model for transaction life cycle management.
  • Http Whiteboard – Updates to the Http Whiteboard model.
  • Push Streams and Promises – The Promises packages is updated with new methods and an improved implementation and the new Push Streams package provides a stream programming model for asynchronously arriving events.
  • Configurator and Configuration Admin – Configuration Admin is updated to support the new Configurator specification for delivering configuration data in bundles.
  • LogService – A new logging API is added which supports logging levels and dynamic logging administration and a new Push Stream-based means of receiving log entries is also added.
  • Bundle Annotations – Annotations that allow the developer to inform tooling on how to build bundles.
  • CDI – Context and Dependency Injection support for OSGi developers.
Stay tuned and I hope you find the technical information in the blog post series useful to you as developers!

Tuesday, February 28, 2017

OSGi API Snapshots are Live!

Sometime back, OSGi began to make all design document (RFC) drafts available in real time from the OSGi Design GitHub repository. In furtherance of providing real time access to the latest design work at OSGi, OSGi made a change to the OSGi build process. Previously, the various OSGi specification's API code had only been published by the Alliance once a specification release has been declared final. Since mid February, however, the OSGi build has been publishing API snapshots to the public https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/osgi/ group repository! Many thanks to BJ Hargrave for making this happen.

So why should you care?

Broadly speaking, the people who care about the pre-release OSGi APIs fall into two sets:
  1. The people who want to try out the new draft APIs in their applications.
  2. The people who want to implement the new draft APIs.
At first glance, it looks like the new release policy only helps the second group - after all it saves them from some issues
  • How do I keep up to date with the OSGi RFCs?
  • Is there a way to avoid duplicating the OSGi draft API source code?
But actually there are two important ways that publishing snapshots directly helps users:
  1. By making it easier for implementors to keep up to date with RFCs, users get faster access to new implementations of the draft API.
  2. For implementation code published by the OSGi Alliance, you get access to the draft code right now!
A good example of this would be OSGi Push Streams. You may have already watched the talk I gave in Portland about them, and been wondering when you could try them out. The answer is right now, and the same is true for the new 1.1 version of OSGi Promises!

Helping implementors

Open Source implementations of OSGi specifications are already moving to use the new draft API snapshots from OSGi (for example the Aries JAX-RS whiteboard). In most cases the API can be simply referenced from the OSGi group repository and no further action is needed.

One thing worthy of note is that the latest OSGi APIs are all compiled using Java 8. For some implementations, this is a problem as they wish to include the API inside their bundle but also to be usable on older versions of Java. In these cases, implementors may wish to try using a tool such as the Retrolambda project, so that they can still benefit from the published snapshots.

We hope that you enjoy the chance to play with all the cool new specifications!

Thursday, October 20, 2016

OSGi R7 early spec drafts available

Recently OSGi published the first early draft for the OSGi R7. While not all specs aimed for R7 are present yet, a few new ones have appeared that can be checked out. The new ones are:
  • Chapter 147 - Transaction Control Service. This specification provides an improved mechanism to perform work in a transaction scope. It provides a higher level of abstraction than the extising JTA integration specification, which makes it really easy to write transactional code, especially when using Java 8 lambdas.
  • Chapter 148 - Converter. Convert anything into everything, and back. A universal object converter which can be used to convert simple values between datatypes, but it can also be used to convert complex structures such as maps or DTOs to interfaces or annotations. Previously functionality such as this was already supported in DS, which allows you to access a component's configuration map via an annotation. Now, this can be used anywhere you like...
  • Chapter 706 - Push Streams. These provide a programming model similar to Java 8 pull-based streams, but then using a push model. Useful for data such as events that arrives asynchronously. The data can be mapped, buffered, splitted, filtered or otherwise processed before it gets sent to the receiver. 
You can find the R7 early drafts at the OSGi website here: https://www.osgi.org/developer/specifications/drafts/
Opensource implementations are already starting to appear, check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSGi_Specification_Implementations for where to obtain OSGi specification implementations.

As always, these are early drafts. Things will definitely change in some of the details. If you want to learn more about these and other upcoming OSGi specifications, come and visit the OSGi Community Event at EclipseCon Europe in Ludwigsburg https://www.osgi.org/2016-osgi-community-event.