tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post6730264173978069182..comments2023-12-06T19:00:46.094+00:00Comments on OSGi Blog: JSR 294 Superpackages No MoreJürgen Alberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02725834158183495837noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post-3362030574318229322008-05-13T17:12:00.000+00:002008-05-13T17:12:00.000+00:00I do think that a module keyword is a good idea be...I do think that a module keyword is a good idea because it does provide value. Adding a keyword is possible as long as it is not made a keyword that can appear anywhere in source form. It is quite easy to only interpret the module keyword in places where only keywords are used, thereby not classing with existing code.<BR/><BR/>Problems with generics go deeper but they were mostly caused (I was Peter Krienshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11373850803487010328noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post-38251444035675425242008-05-11T09:13:00.000+00:002008-05-11T09:13:00.000+00:00Hi Peter,I have a question regarding JSR 294:1- Ar...Hi Peter,<BR/><BR/>I have a question regarding JSR 294:<BR/><BR/>1- Are there any benefits in extending Java's syntax to support modules, etc. syntactically instead of relying on APIs, etc?<BR/><BR/>Last time I remember, extending Java's syntax was not a very successful operation: Generics have a lot of ugly edge cases.<BR/><BR/>Even if introduced without any ugly side effects and edge cases, areAngry Developerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04382540026757780798noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post-85816176712102807852008-04-23T03:56:00.000+00:002008-04-23T03:56:00.000+00:00+1 from me for your suggestions+1 from me for your suggestionshlovatthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07048859648718746436noreply@blogger.com