tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post1384228145038559196..comments2023-12-06T19:00:46.094+00:00Comments on OSGi Blog: Is XML Part of the Problem?Jürgen Alberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02725834158183495837noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post-60089408591037821962008-07-02T14:37:00.000+00:002008-07-02T14:37:00.000+00:00yes, annotation great, but it's cannot replace the...yes, annotation great, but it's cannot replace the position of configuration files.<BR/>So back to .ini again?<BR/>or osgi.ini style extension?<BR/>Indeed, since configuration files is a must thing, so how do we configure?<BR/>We need a need format and must a oo style configuration.<BR/>I do an ObjectNotation at on.dev.java.net.<BR/>And now, I make it support map directly.<BR/>And it's so simple Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14869364187110865860noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post-79870866206892715032008-04-21T07:04:00.000+00:002008-04-21T07:04:00.000+00:00My colleagues and I have been saying this for more...My colleagues and I have been saying this for more than 5 years. There seemed to be a point where people were rushing to drop properties files in favour of XML and this just added complexity to something that should be very simple. As a result, even though we went through the same hype cycle, we soon abandoned XML files where properties files were already adequate.Chris Brindhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15060997991535798622noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post-60824123690055984662008-04-19T18:00:00.000+00:002008-04-19T18:00:00.000+00:00This is why Spring has annotation driven configura...This is why Spring has annotation driven configuration. Google Guice uses it exclusively, eschewing XML completely. It's really a toss up, personally.Hal Hildebrandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04179863099003329867noreply@blogger.com