The OSGi way is that the database is provided as a service. By providing it as a service you allow the deployer (the person that provides your application a place to run, which is often yourself but it makes sense to separate these roles) to pick a database brand at runtime by deploying the proper bundle and configuring it. That is, as a user of the database this is the code in the OSGi way:
@Component
public class DatabaseUser {
DataSource ds;
@Reference
void setDataSource( DataSource ds) {
this.ds = ds;
}
}
This model is very elegant, it uncouples a lot of details from the component. The component does not have to worry about database configuration, transaction model, passwords, pooling, and not even its brand. Obviously, a component can have special dependencies because it uses proprietary features of certain databases (SQL is treated by vendors more like a recommendation than a specification), these can always be reflected by
Require-Capability headers. That said, careful components can restrict themselves to a lowest common denominator so that they can work with any or most SQL databases.This leaves us the problem how to get the
DataSource object without specifying its brand (or password!) in our code/xml? In a perfect OSGi world we would have JDBC drivers that use Configuration Admin to specify the desired Data Sources; the driver bundle would just register these configured Data Sources. This requires a trivial amount of code since JDBC drivers already configure themselves with properties, a good match to Configuration Admin.We did not choose this model during the OSGi Enterprise specification because we thought this might be too much work for the driver vendors. I guess that was the correct assessment since the even easier to implement
DataSourceFactory service that we did specify is still rare. The Data Source Factory service provides methods to create configured ConnectionPoolDataSource, DataSource, Driver, and XADataSource objects. With this interface it is fortunately not very hard to make a generic component that registers our desired Data Source services:
@Component(configurationPolicy=REQUIRED)
public class ConfiguredDataSource extends DataSource{
DataSourceFactory dsf;
DataSource ds;
@Activate
void activate(Map map) throws Exception {
Properties p = new Properties();
p.putAll(map);
ds = dsf.createDataSource(p);
}
public Connection getConnection() throws SQLException {
return ds.getConnection();
}
public Connection getConnection(String username, String password)
throws SQLException {
return ds.getConnection(username, password);
}
@Reference
void setDataSourceFactory( DataSourceFactory ds) {
this.dsf = dsf;
}
}
Realize hat this code is much more flexible than it looks at first sight because it leverages Declarative Services's features. Through Configuration Admin you can bind it to different brands of databases, you can set passwords, configuration options, and instantiate multiple DataSource services. However, the hard part, as is sadly still too often the case with OSGi, is finding a bundle that implements this specification. Without much hope I looked at the H2 database that I was already using in my prototypes. It is a fine example of a Java library. Rarely have seen a product with so many features, so small (1Mb), and so few dependencies (0). It is delivered out of the box as an OSGi bundle. And it actually registers a Data Source Factory service! I also got H2 to work with OpenJPA the OSGi way since the OSGi Specifications mandates JPA to use the OSGi way for JDBC, though this did not work out of the box yet. If only more code was delivered like this ...
To conclude, Java persistence is still a mess in my personal opinion; it will require a lot of work to make it all work the OSGi way. However, at least there is light at the end of the tunnel. Thanks H2 guys for this good out of the box component experience, hope you set a widely followed precedent. You definitely gave me hope.
Peter Kriens @pkriens
P.S. If you want to experiment with this approach, look at OPS4j Pax JADBC, the created adapters for laggards in this area.