tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post8552099479612430160..comments2023-12-06T19:00:46.094+00:00Comments on OSGi Blog: Where Will JSR 277 End Up?Jürgen Alberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02725834158183495837noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post-48285602536990141142008-02-10T07:32:00.000+00:002008-02-10T07:32:00.000+00:00Hi Peter, I couldn't agree more on your comment to...Hi Peter, <BR/><BR/>I couldn't agree more on your comment to have a first class support for JSR 291.<BR/><BR/>What beats me is what gap does 277 see in 291 that merits a separate modular system altogether?<BR/><BR/>Cheers, <BR/>RahulRahulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11713243228091382998noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post-12283790750553803472007-06-05T12:40:00.000+00:002007-06-05T12:40:00.000+00:00I think you confuse two issues. JREs, VMs, JDKs, a...I think you confuse two issues. JREs, VMs, JDKs, and such should be updated frequently to increase speed, reduce memory consumption etc. Not only by SUN, but by all vendors that support the language.<BR/><BR/>However, three is in my mind no absolute necessity to add features to the core environment, the more stable the core is the better.<BR/><BR/>I also like several of the features that Java 5 Peter Krienshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11373850803487010328noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18772002.post-12763415569650656142007-06-05T07:37:00.000+00:002007-06-05T07:37:00.000+00:00I can not agree about JDK 1.6. Sun made great work...I can not agree about JDK 1.6. <BR/>Sun made great work on performance jvm. I think we must use last jdk for development(exclude can be only desktop application because JDK 6 does released at Mac OS X) and last jre for running application. <BR/> <BR/>When I watch screencast at AppFuse I think that I am living in past (my current project uses JDK 1.4)erkahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14540127758819969027noreply@blogger.com